Feisty Aphrodite Archives
Views on Sex-Ed Divide Democratic, GOP Candidates
The following is from an article written by Alison Bowen for Women's eNews:
An end to abstinence-only sex education was at the top of the list when 600 self-described feminists met in New York recently to rally their ranks and craft a platform for U.S. presidential lobbying. Abstinence-only--for which President Bush proposes a 2008 budget of $204 million--has avid supporters and wary detractors, who want to find a more comprehensive way to present sex education.
In March, three members of Congress introduced a bill to authorize federal funds for states' comprehensive sex education that offers menu of options from abstinence to contraception and abortion. The Responsible Education About Life Act--or the REAL Act as the bill is known--was sponsored by Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, D-N.J.; Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif.; and Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn.
The following month a congressional study found that abstinence-only education--which emphasizes chastity, or abstaining from sex, as the best practice for teens--did not significantly delay their decisions whether to have sex. Over a dozen states have dodged abstinence-only curricula for their schools by declining the funds that mandate it.
...
In the wake of President Bush's Oct. 3 veto of the State Children's Health Insurance Program--the low-cost health insurance for families who don't qualify for Medicaid but can't afford private insurance--some Democratic advocates of SCHIP tried to sweeten it for Republicans by attaching a $28 million increase in abstinence funding. That effort failed, but it showed the extent to which abstinence funding is viewed as a potent bipartisan bargaining.
For nearly a decade, since Bush increased funding for abstinence programs that were by and large introduced during Bill Clinton's administration, the philosophical struggle over sex education has been between an abstinence-only approach and comprehensive sex-ed. Out of that tug of war, compromisers have for a couple of years been promoting a middle way: "abstinence-plus," which mentions abstinence within a broader discussion of safe sex. Programs combining both abstinence and contraception were most effective, a Nov. 7 study by the Washington-based National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy reported, echoing Virginia Gov. Kaine's reasons for declining abstinence-only funding.
But abstinence-plus by no means pleases everyone. In 2004 the Heritage Foundation, the Washington think tank, warned that abstinence instruction comprises only about 5 percent of abstinence-plus curricula. In authentic abstinence curricula, that figure should be 54 percent, the report said. Abstinence advocates argue that studies pinpointing abstinence-only education as a failure surveyed children too young to understand the message and didn't reach a large enough sample of abstinence programs.
Few of the presidential candidates have said much yet about any of this, and few in the news media have asked on the campaign trail.
To read where each candidate stands on this issue, along with the the entire article, click here.
